So I decided to open the asterisk-ridden file in another application to see what might happen. So I knew the data wasn't lost. For a split second, the text was there before it turned back into asterisks. Nevertheless, I shut down Word then re-opened the document.Type the asterisk sign () three times in your document. Next, place your cursor where you want to add a dotted line in your document. Done some googling and it seems the file is u recoverable.To use a line shortcut, first, open your document with Microsoft Word. In these cases, we want to keep the words together, and the best method is to use a nonbreaking space.This afternoon, while working on a document in wor, it just turned all her text into asterisks.It’s also poor practice for text that may be repurposed for a reprint or in a different medium: whenever the text reflows, the soft return will yield a shortened line that buggers up the flow of the text.Not all star codes work for all systems, however many of the important ones should. In general, using soft returns is poor practice, because if you delete anything from the line above, you end up with a short line or unsightly gaps (if the text has been fully justified). Advertisement.I once worked with a company that output its final reports from Word, and whenever something like “$6 million” broke over a line, the in-house staff would use a soft return before the “$6” to push it to the next line.
![]() ![]() ![]() Lana Okerlund told us about GeoBC for fact checking B.C. I mentioned the Library of Congress Authorities as a reliable place to check names. The University of Victoria Libraries vouch for the database’s reliability. Microsoft Word’s bibliography tool does the same thing (under “Manage Sources”)The trick to all of these programs, though, is that you would have had to work with your client or author early enough in the writing process for them to have used them from the outset. In both of these programs, you can enter all of your bibliographic information, and it produces a bibliography in the style (e.g., Chicago) that you want. The former costs $100 (USD), whereas the latter is free. Stef Alexandru told us about RefWorks and Zotero, which are bibliographic management programs. The tool lets you perform multiple Google searches at once—a boon for checking fact-heavy texts. I also told the crowd about SearchOpener, which I’d mentioned in a previous post. Jack Lyon’s Editorium has a FileCleaner Word add-on that helps with a lot of common search-and-replace cleanup steps. For fact checking bibliographical information, one suggestion was to use WorldCat. Now I look them up once, enter them in the dataset, and move on. I once timed it and found that I can check about 600 references in approximately 15 minutes it used to take me hours, especially if I had to look up obscure and rarely cited journal names. Using the Journals macro, I can check and correct most of the entries in the list automatically. Microsoft Word Document Becomes All Asterisks Series Of BoilerplateTheresa Best keeps a series of boilerplate emails in her Drafts folder another suggestion was to have boilerplate email text as signature files. You can also attach specific dictionaries or style sheets to it. It catches consistency errors that Word’s spelling and grammar checkers miss, including hyphenation, capitalization, and treatment of numbers. Nobody in the room had tried PerfectIt, but there seemed to be positive views of it on EAC’s listserv. To remove formatting from text on the clipboard, suggested apps include Plain Clip and Format Match. Grace Yaginuma told us how to strip all hyperlinks from your file by selecting all (Ctrl + A) and then using Ctrl + Shift + F9. Photoshop cs upgrade for macintosh macOne person said Scrivener is a fantastic tool for easily moving large chunks of text around and other aspects of structural editing. A few people in the audience mentioned that a surprising number of editors don’t know about using Outline View or Navigation Pane in Microsoft Word to do outlining and structural editing. Naomi Pauls and Theresa Best talked about the utility of checklists. Store longer pieces of boilerplate text as AutoText. Theresa Best has just begun using Tom’s Planner, which she described as a free and intuitive project-management program. (Someone also mentioned Goggle as a time tracker, but I can’t find anything about it. Other options recommended include iBiz and FreshBooks. Someone else proposed a resource that would be a kind of cheat sheet to summarize the main differences between the major style guides, to make it easier to jump from one to another when working on different projects. (Being able to have your word processer reference it while checking the document would be a plus.) Naomi Pauls said that she’d like to see a style sheet app that lets you choose style options easily rather than having to key them in. One recommended scheduling app for arranging meetings is Doodle.com.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJohn ArchivesCategories |